Furrow v. Bisson
Docket: No. 05-56438
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; April 19, 2006; Federal Appellate Court
Appellee's letter from January 27, 2006, is interpreted as a Motion for Summary Affirmance. Upon reviewing the record and the opening brief, it is determined that the issues presented in the appeal lack substantial merit and do not warrant further discussion, referencing the precedent in United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is affirmed without further elaboration. This decision is not intended for publication and cannot be cited in this circuit's courts, as specified by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.