Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on December 27, 2005, denying the application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals in the case of Paul Kuntz, Jr. v. USF Holland, Inc. and Constitution State Services, L.L.C. The Court found that the questions presented did not warrant review. The order was certified as a true and complete copy by Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court exercised its discretion to deny the application for leave to appeal, indicating that it did not find the issues presented in the case to be significant enough to warrant further review.
Reasoning: The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on December 27, 2005, denying the application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals in the case of Paul Kuntz, Jr. v. USF Holland, Inc. and Constitution State Services, L.L.C.
Discretionary Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court determined that the questions in the case did not meet the criteria for discretionary review, which is a selective process for granting appeals based on the significance of the legal questions presented.
Reasoning: The Court found that the questions presented did not warrant review.