Narrative Opinion Summary
The appeals in question are deemed insubstantial and do not warrant further argument, as established by precedent in United States v. Hooton. Consequently, the district court's judgment is summarily affirmed. All pending motions related to the case are denied as moot. This decision is not intended for publication and cannot be cited by courts within this circuit, except in accordance with 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Legal Issues Addressed
Mootness of Pending Motionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: All pending motions in the case are denied as moot following the summary affirmation of the judgment.
Reasoning: All pending motions related to the case are denied as moot.
Non-Publication and Citation Restrictionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision is not intended for publication and cannot be cited by courts within this circuit, except as allowed by specific court rules.
Reasoning: This decision is not intended for publication and cannot be cited by courts within this circuit, except in accordance with 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Summary Affirmation of Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The district court's judgment is summarily affirmed based on its insubstantial nature, following precedent.
Reasoning: The appeals in question are deemed insubstantial and do not warrant further argument, as established by precedent in United States v. Hooton. Consequently, the district court's judgment is summarily affirmed.