Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on January 27, 2006, regarding the appeal by Amerisure Insurance Companies and Auto-Owners Insurance Company against the Michigan Basic Property Insurance Association. The Court denied the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2005 judgment from the Court of Appeals, concluding that the issues raised did not merit review. Justices Cavanagh and Kelly expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating they would have granted leave to appeal. The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis as a true and complete copy of the Court's directive.
Legal Issues Addressed
Certification of Court Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court order was officially certified by the Clerk, ensuring its authenticity and completeness as a record of the Court's directive.
Reasoning: The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis as a true and complete copy of the Court's directive.
Denial of Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court exercised its discretion to deny the application for leave to appeal, indicating that the issues raised did not warrant further review by the Court.
Reasoning: The Court denied the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2005 judgment from the Court of Appeals, concluding that the issues raised did not merit review.
Dissenting Opinion in Judicial Decisionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justices Cavanagh and Kelly disagreed with the majority decision to deny leave to appeal and would have preferred to grant it, highlighting a division in judicial opinion.
Reasoning: Justices Cavanagh and Kelly expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating they would have granted leave to appeal.