Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Cunningham v. Warden FCI Bennettsville
Citation: 443 F. App'x 869Docket: No. 11-6755
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; August 23, 2011; Federal Appellate Court
Eugene Jerome Cunningham's appeal of the district court's order, which accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief on his petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241, has been affirmed. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, thus upholding the district court's decision for the reasons outlined in the original order (Cunningham v. Warden, No. 9:10-cv-02105-CMC, D.S.C. June 1, 2011). The court opted not to hold oral arguments, concluding that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently detailed in the submitted materials. The ruling is affirmed. Unpublished opinions hold no binding precedent in this circuit.