Narrative Opinion Summary
Tolliver Quaco's appeal of the district court's order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela has been affirmed by a PER CURIAM opinion. The court found no reversible error upon reviewing the record. The affirmation is based on the reasons provided by the district court in the case of United States v. Quaco, No. 1:90-cr-00275-JCC-l. The court decided to forgo oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently addressed in the submitted materials.
Legal Issues Addressed
Decision Without Oral Argumentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court opted not to hold oral argument, determining that the written submissions adequately presented the facts and legal issues.
Reasoning: The court decided to forgo oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently addressed in the submitted materials.
Review for Reversible Errorsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.
Reasoning: The court found no reversible error upon reviewing the record.
Writ of Audita Querelasubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court affirmed the district court's denial of Tolliver Quaco's motion for a writ of audita querela, indicating that the appeal did not demonstrate any reversible error.
Reasoning: Tolliver Quaco's appeal of the district court's order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela has been affirmed by a PER CURIAM opinion.