You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Key Safety Systems, Inc. v. Dynacast, Inc.

Citations: 711 N.W.2d 66; 474 Mich. 1097; 2006 Mich. LEXIS 534Docket: 130504

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; March 26, 2006; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on March 27, 2006, regarding case number 130504 involving KEY SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. (Plaintiff-Appellant) and DYNACAST, INC. and DYNACAST CANADA, INC. (Defendants-Appellants). The Court granted a motion for immediate consideration but denied the application for leave to appeal a February 10, 2006, order from the Court of Appeals, stating that the issues raised did not warrant review. Additionally, a motion to strike was denied as moot. The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Leave to Appeal

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court denied the application for leave to appeal, indicating that the issues raised by the appellant were not significant enough to warrant the court's further review.

Reasoning: The Court granted a motion for immediate consideration but denied the application for leave to appeal a February 10, 2006, order from the Court of Appeals, stating that the issues raised did not warrant review.

Immediate Consideration Motion

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court granted the motion for immediate consideration, allowing expedited review of the procedural aspects of the case.

Reasoning: The Court granted a motion for immediate consideration but denied the application for leave to appeal a February 10, 2006, order from the Court of Appeals.

Mootness of Motion to Strike

Application: The court denied the motion to strike as moot, suggesting that the motion was no longer relevant to the proceedings after the denial of the application for leave to appeal.

Reasoning: Additionally, a motion to strike was denied as moot.