Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Marshall
Citation: 414 F. App'x 526Docket: No. 10-7343
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; March 2, 2011; Federal Appellate Court
Kalvin Marshall's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) has been affirmed by a PER CURIAM opinion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, thereby upholding the district court's decision for the reasons provided in its ruling. The case, United States v. Marshall, No. 3:02-cr-00225-HEH-2, was decided in the Eastern District of Virginia on September 8, 2010. The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the existing documentation.