You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Farmer v. Troy Univ.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 457PA19-2

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina; November 4, 2022; North Carolina; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, a former employee of Troy University, an Alabama state institution, filed a lawsuit in North Carolina alleging wrongful termination and various tort claims after experiencing workplace harassment and retaliation. The key legal issue revolved around whether Troy University, by conducting business and obtaining nonprofit registration in North Carolina, had waived its sovereign immunity, thus allowing it to be sued in the state. The trial court initially dismissed the case based on sovereign immunity, a decision upheld by the Court of Appeals. However, the North Carolina Supreme Court reversed this decision, determining that Troy University's registration under the North Carolina Nonprofit Corporation Act, which includes a 'sue and be sued' clause, constituted an explicit waiver of its sovereign immunity. The court emphasized the distinction between governmental and commercial activities, concluding that the university's recruitment operations in North Carolina were commercial. The ruling allows the plaintiff to proceed with his claims against the university, as the court found that sovereign immunity was waived, permitting the lawsuit to continue in North Carolina courts.

Legal Issues Addressed

Application of the 'Sue and Be Sued' Clause

Application: The court held that the 'sue and be sued' clause in the North Carolina Nonprofit Corporation Act constituted a waiver of sovereign immunity for Troy University.

Reasoning: It is established that any waiver must be explicit; however, the U.S. Supreme Court does not support the notion that a 'sue and be sued' clause cannot serve as an explicit waiver of sovereign immunity.

Distinction Between Governmental and Commercial Activities

Application: The court distinguished between governmental and commercial activities, finding that Troy University's recruitment efforts in North Carolina were commercial, thus subjecting them to legal action.

Reasoning: The complaint indicates that Troy University was actively marketing and recruiting students in North Carolina, which aligns more with business activities rather than governmental functions.

Review of Motions to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6)

Application: The court conducted a de novo review of the trial court's decision to dismiss the case, considering whether the allegations, if true, could support a legal claim.

Reasoning: Review of the motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure is de novo, meaning the court evaluates whether the complaint's allegations, if true, can support a legal claim for relief.

Sovereign Immunity and State Institutions

Application: The court determined that Troy University, by registering as a nonprofit in North Carolina, waived its sovereign immunity and could be sued in the state.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of North Carolina, referencing two 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decisions, determined that by registering as a nonprofit in North Carolina and conducting business there, Troy University explicitly waived its sovereign immunity.