You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY

Citations: 711 N.W.2d 743; 474 Mich. 1109Docket: 130696

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; April 7, 2006; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on April 7, 2006, involving Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan as the appellant and Citizens Insurance Company of America, along with Gregory Steiner, as appellees. The Court granted the motion for immediate consideration but denied the application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' February 1, 2006 order, concluding that the issues raised did not warrant review by the Supreme Court. Additionally, the motion to stay was also denied. The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis, affirming its authenticity.

Legal Issues Addressed

Certification of Court Order

Application: The order was certified by the Clerk, ensuring its validity and official recognition.

Reasoning: The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis, affirming its authenticity.

Denial of Leave to Appeal

Application: The Supreme Court denied the application for leave to appeal, suggesting that the issues presented were not significant enough to merit the Supreme Court's review.

Reasoning: The Court granted the motion for immediate consideration but denied the application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' February 1, 2006 order, concluding that the issues raised did not warrant review by the Supreme Court.

Denial of Motion to Stay

Application: The motion to stay was denied, indicating that the Court saw no sufficient reason to halt proceedings or actions pending appeal.

Reasoning: Additionally, the motion to stay was also denied.

Immediate Consideration of Motion

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court granted the motion for immediate consideration, indicating the procedural aspect of addressing urgent matters promptly.

Reasoning: The Court granted the motion for immediate consideration but denied the application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' February 1, 2006 order.