Sines v. Urhen
Docket: No. 05-6198
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; June 20, 2005; Federal Appellate Court
Robert T. Sines appeals the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, which was reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The court found no reversible error in the record, leading to the denial of Sines' motion for appointment of counsel and his motions to add a party. The affirmation of the lower court's decision is based on Sines' failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The case reference is Sines v. Urhen, No. CA-04-221 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2004). The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the existing materials. The final judgment is to affirm the lower court's decision.