You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Springfield v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Co.

Citation: 123 F. App'x 156Docket: No. 04-60379

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; March 13, 2005; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Plaintiff-appellant Springfield appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants regarding claims under Title VII, intentional torts, negligence, and wrongful termination. The appellate court affirms the district court’s decision based on the reasoning provided in its order. The opinion is unpublished and not considered precedent, except in specific circumstances outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Legal Issues Addressed

Non-Precedential Opinions

Application: The opinion in this case is unpublished and thus not considered binding precedent, except under specific conditions allowed by circuit rules.

Reasoning: The opinion is unpublished and not considered precedent, except in specific circumstances outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendants

Application: The appellate court affirms the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for the defendants on all claims raised by the plaintiff-appellant.

Reasoning: Plaintiff-appellant Springfield appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants regarding claims under Title VII, intentional torts, negligence, and wrongful termination.