Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Joseph v. Ayers
Citation: 116 F. App'x 166Docket: No. 03-15465; D.C. No. CV-99-20574-JF
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; December 22, 2004; Federal Appellate Court
The California Court of Appeal's rejection of the appellant's prosecutorial misconduct claim was deemed consistent with established federal law under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). The court found no violation of the government's duty to disclose information as required by Brady v. Maryland or any other established federal law. The appellant's request to address an uncertified claim regarding the admission of prior bad acts evidence was interpreted as a request to expand the certificate of appealability, which was denied. The ruling is affirmed, and publication of this disposition is restricted, as per Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.