Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Trentadue v. BUCKLER AUTOMATIC LAWN SPRINKLER COMPANY
Citations: 717 N.W.2d 329; 475 Mich. 906Docket: 128579
Court: Michigan Supreme Court; July 19, 2006; Michigan; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The Michigan Supreme Court granted an application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' judgment dated May 5, 2005, in the case involving Dayle Trentadue, representing the estate of Stephen J. Markman, against Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Company and others. The Court directed the parties to address in their briefs whether the Court of Appeals' application of a common law discovery rule for determining the accrual of the plaintiff's claims is inconsistent with MCL 600.5827. Additionally, the Court seeks to evaluate whether prior decisions that recognized and applied this common law rule, despite the implications of MCL 600.5827, should be overruled. The order was certified by Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, on July 19, 2006.