Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Nautilus Group, Inc. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Citation: 85 F. App'x 743Docket: No. 03-1526
Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; October 30, 2003; Federal Appellate Court
Nautilus Group, Inc. filed a motion for leave to submit a reply to ICON Health and Fitness, Inc.'s opposition concerning its combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The court has denied this motion. Additionally, the court notes that ICON has not yet responded to Nautilus's motion. Nautilus is reminded of its obligation under Fed. Cir. Rule 27(a)(5) to consult with other parties regarding the motion and to disclose whether any party will object or respond. Non-compliance with this rule has led to the court being uninformed about opposing counsel’s stance on the requested relief.