Narrative Opinion Summary
The appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has been reviewed based on the record, briefs, and counsel arguments. The court affirms the district court's judgment, citing the reasoning in Smith v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 346 F.3d 264 (2d Cir. 2003). The decision will not be published as per D.C. Circuit Rule 36. The Clerk is instructed to delay the issuance of the mandate for seven days after any timely requests for rehearing or rehearing en banc are resolved, in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b) and D.C. Circuit Rule 41(a)(1).
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Lower Court Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirmed the judgment of the district court, indicating agreement with the lower court's decision and reasoning.
Reasoning: The court affirms the district court's judgment, citing the reasoning in Smith v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 346 F.3d 264 (2d Cir. 2003).
Issuance of Mandatesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The issuance of the mandate is to be delayed to allow for the resolution of any timely filed requests for rehearing or rehearing en banc.
Reasoning: The Clerk is instructed to delay the issuance of the mandate for seven days after any timely requests for rehearing or rehearing en banc are resolved, in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b) and D.C. Circuit Rule 41(a)(1).
Non-Publication of Decisionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision by the appellate court will not be published, which is consistent with the court's procedural rules.
Reasoning: The decision will not be published as per D.C. Circuit Rule 36.