Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Jacob v. Wells Fargo Security Guard Services
Citation: 75 F. App'x 613Docket: No. 02-17482; D.C. No. CV-00-01855-MMC
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; September 15, 2003; Federal Appellate Court
Khadijah Jacob appeals pro se against the district court’s judgment favoring Wells Fargo Security Guard Services, following two jury trials related to her claims of sex and age discrimination under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The appeal is dismissed due to Jacob's failure to provide a trial transcript, which is necessary to substantiate her claims, including allegations of perjured and prejudicial evidence introduced by defense counsel and interference with her cross-examination rights. Although Jacob's motion to supplement the record is granted, the lack of a transcript prevents the court from reviewing her contentions. The decision is not intended for publication and cannot be cited in future cases within the circuit, per Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.