Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Sci Games Ltd. v. Eidos PLC
Citation: 74 F. App'x 812Docket: No. 03-56045; D.C. No. CV-03-03637-AHM(JWJ)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; September 10, 2003; Federal Appellate Court
A preliminary injunction appeal was reviewed under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3, with jurisdiction established under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). The court affirmed the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction. The review of such orders is limited, focusing on whether the district court abused its discretion, which occurs only if there is an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings. The court found no abuse of discretion in this case. The decision will affect the parties' rights only until the district court issues a final judgment. The ruling is not suitable for publication and cannot be cited in future cases except as permitted by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.