Squirek v. Law Offices of Sessoms & Rogers, P.A.
Docket: No. 03-1746
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; August 20, 2003; Federal Appellate Court
Thomas J. Squirek appeals the dismissal of his complaint against the Law Offices of Sessoms, Rogers, P.A. and Stuart M. Sessoms, Jr. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, leading to an affirmation of the district court's decision. The court referenced the district court's reasoning in Squirek v. Law Offices of Sessoms, Rogers, P.A., 2003 WL 21026580, No. CA-02—40—1 (M.D.N.C. May 5, 2003). The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the submitted materials.