Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Orzel v. POLLAS FAMILY MARKET
Citations: 723 N.W.2d 901; 477 Mich. 953Docket: 131740
Court: Michigan Supreme Court; November 29, 2006; Michigan; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The Michigan Supreme Court, in an order dated November 30, 2006, addressed the application for leave to appeal a decision from the Court of Appeals dated June 20, 2006, in the case involving Plaintiff-Appellee John Orzel against Defendants-Appellants Pollas Family Market, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, and Shield Risk Services, with the Second Injury Fund also named as a defendant. The Court denied the application for leave to appeal, indicating that the questions presented did not warrant review. The order was certified as a true and complete copy by Clerk Corbin R. Davis.