You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

United States v. Havis

Citation: 921 F.3d 628Docket: No. 17-5772

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; April 18, 2019; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

A majority of the active Judges of this Court have voted to rehear the case en banc. According to Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b), this action vacates the previous opinion and judgment, stays the mandate, and reinstates the case on the docket as a pending appeal. It is ordered that the prior decision and judgment are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and the case is restored to the docket. Further briefing and scheduling for oral argument will be directed by the Clerk.

Legal Issues Addressed

Court Procedures for Rehearing

Application: The Clerk is responsible for directing further briefing and scheduling for oral argument after a case is reinstated for rehearing en banc.

Reasoning: Further briefing and scheduling for oral argument will be directed by the Clerk.

Effect of Rehearing En Banc on Prior Judgment

Application: The decision to rehear the case en banc results in the vacating of the previous opinion and judgment, staying the mandate, and reinstating the case as a pending appeal.

Reasoning: According to Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b), this action vacates the previous opinion and judgment, stays the mandate, and reinstates the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Rehearing En Banc Procedure

Application: The case is reheard en banc following a majority vote by the active Judges of the Court, impacting the status of the previous opinion and judgment.

Reasoning: A majority of the active Judges of this Court have voted to rehear the case en banc.