You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Ileto v. Glock Inc.

Citations: 370 F.3d 860; 2004 WL 1178214Docket: No. 02-56197

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; May 28, 2004; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The panel majority has denied both the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Hall dissented, voting to grant the petition for panel rehearing and recommending that the petition for rehearing en banc be approved. Despite notifying the full court of the petition, a judge's request for a vote on en banc reconsideration did not receive a majority from the nonrecused active judges. Consequently, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Petition for Panel Rehearing

Application: The majority of the panel chose not to grant the petition for panel rehearing, indicating that the original decision stands without further review by the same panel.

Reasoning: The panel majority has denied both the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.

Dissent in Judicial Decision-Making

Application: Judge Hall expressed disagreement with the majority by voting to grant the petition for panel rehearing and advocating for en banc consideration.

Reasoning: Judge Hall dissented, voting to grant the petition for panel rehearing and recommending that the petition for rehearing en banc be approved.

En Banc Reconsideration Process

Application: The lack of a majority vote from nonrecused active judges led to the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc, pursuant to procedural rules.

Reasoning: Despite notifying the full court of the petition, a judge's request for a vote on en banc reconsideration did not receive a majority from the nonrecused active judges.

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35

Application: The denial of the petition for rehearing en banc followed the guidelines set out in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35, which governs the standards and procedures for en banc review.

Reasoning: Consequently, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.