You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

JOHN ENNIS v. WEST LAKE VILLAGE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-2695

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; October 27, 2022; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

John Ennis, also known as Sol Adoni, appealed a decision from the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, presided over by Judge Michele Towbin Singer, against multiple appellees including West Lake Village Homeowners' Association, Michael Franz, the City of Hollywood, Scottsdale Insurance Company, and Nationwide Insurance Company. The case number is CACE20-005089. The District Court of Appeal of Florida's Fourth District affirmed the lower court's ruling without further elaboration. The decision was issued on October 27, 2022, with judges May, Gerber, and Artau concurring. The ruling is not considered final until the resolution of any timely filed motion for rehearing. John Ennis represented himself, while the appellees were represented by various attorneys from different law firms.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Rulings

Application: The District Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court without providing further details on the reasoning.

Reasoning: The District Court of Appeal of Florida's Fourth District affirmed the lower court's ruling without further elaboration.

Finality of Court Decisions

Application: The ruling is not finalized until any motions for rehearing are resolved, indicating the process for contesting appellate decisions.

Reasoning: The ruling is not considered final until the resolution of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Self-Representation in Appellate Proceedings

Application: John Ennis represented himself in the appeal, reflecting the principle of pro se representation in appellate courts.

Reasoning: John Ennis represented himself, while the appellees were represented by various attorneys from different law firms.