Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on November 21, 2007, regarding the case of Timothy Rumfield, representing the estate of Daniel Rumfield, against defendants Matthew Henney, Brian Henney, and Kelly Fuels, Inc. The Court denied the applications for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' judgment dated September 26, 2006, as well as the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant, citing a lack of persuasion that the issues warranted review. Additionally, the motion for peremptory reversal was also denied. Justice Cavanagh expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating he would have granted leave to appeal. The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Applications for Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court denied the applications for leave to appeal the judgment of the Court of Appeals, indicating no persuasive reason to warrant review of the issues presented.
Reasoning: The Court denied the applications for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' judgment dated September 26, 2006, as well as the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant, citing a lack of persuasion that the issues warranted review.
Denial of Motion for Peremptory Reversalsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The motion for peremptory reversal was denied by the Michigan Supreme Court, maintaining the decision of the lower court without further review.
Reasoning: Additionally, the motion for peremptory reversal was also denied.
Dissenting Opinion on Granting Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justice Cavanagh expressed a dissenting opinion, suggesting that he believed the case warranted a review and would have granted leave to appeal.
Reasoning: Justice Cavanagh expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating he would have granted leave to appeal.