You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

TAROUS LEE MCDUFFIE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-2904

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; October 20, 2022; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Tarous Lee McDuffie appealed a decision from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in St. Lucie County, presided over by Judge Jeffrey Walton Hendriks. The case, numbered 56-2020-MM-001959A, was reviewed by the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling. The decision was rendered per curiam, with Judges Gross, Damoorgian, and Forst concurring. The ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved. The appellant was represented by Public Defender Carey Haughwout and Assistant Public Defender Logan T. Mohs, while the appellee was represented by Attorney General Ashley Moody and Assistant Attorney General Pablo Tapia.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review and Affirmation

Application: The appellate court reviewed the decision of the lower court and affirmed the ruling without issuing a written opinion.

Reasoning: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The ruling is not considered final until the resolution of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Reasoning: The ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Per Curiam Decision

Application: The decision was rendered per curiam, indicating a unanimous agreement among the judges without specifying an author for the opinion.

Reasoning: The decision was rendered per curiam, with Judges Gross, Damoorgian, and Forst concurring.

Representation in Criminal Appeals

Application: The appellant was represented by the Public Defender's Office, and the appellee by the Attorney General's Office, demonstrating the roles of public defense and prosecution in the appeals process.

Reasoning: The appellant was represented by Public Defender Carey Haughwout and Assistant Public Defender Logan T. Mohs, while the appellee was represented by Attorney General Ashley Moody and Assistant Attorney General Pablo Tapia.