You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Pm Group, Inc.

Citations: 745 N.W.2d 793; 480 Mich. 1135; 2008 Mich. LEXIS 495Docket: 135394

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; March 24, 2008; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on March 24, 2008, regarding the case Cadle Company II, Inc. v. P.M. Group, Inc. and Daniel D. Armistead. The Court denied the application for leave to appeal the judgment from the Court of Appeals dated October 25, 2007. The Court expressed that it was not persuaded that the issues raised warranted review. Corbin R. Davis, the Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certified the order as a true and complete copy.

Legal Issues Addressed

Certification of Court Orders

Application: The Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court officially certified the order, confirming its authenticity as a complete record of the Court's decision.

Reasoning: Corbin R. Davis, the Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certified the order as a true and complete copy.

Denial of Leave to Appeal

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court decided not to review the case further by denying the application for leave to appeal.

Reasoning: The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on March 24, 2008, regarding the case Cadle Company II, Inc. v. P.M. Group, Inc. and Daniel D. Armistead. The Court denied the application for leave to appeal the judgment from the Court of Appeals dated October 25, 2007.

Discretionary Review by Supreme Court

Application: The Court exercised its discretion to deny review, indicating it was not convinced that the case presented issues warranting further judicial examination.

Reasoning: The Court expressed that it was not persuaded that the issues raised warranted review.