You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

PALMER GAL v. Jackson

Citations: 593 S.E.2d 782; 2004 N.C. LEXIS 164; 2004 WL 491056Docket: No. 336PA03.

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina; March 4, 2004; North Carolina; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The court has granted the motion filed on February 18, 2004, by the Appellee regarding the allotment of time for oral arguments. UNC Hospitals and UNC Physicians are allocated 10 minutes of the total 60 minutes for oral argument. The Plaintiff Appellant and Defendant Appellees, specifically Jackson and Companion Property and Casualty, will each receive 25 minutes for their oral arguments. This order was issued by the Court during a conference on March 4, 2004.

Legal Issues Addressed

Allocation of Time for Oral Argument

Application: The court exercised its discretion to allocate specific time limits for oral arguments among the parties involved in the case.

Reasoning: The court has granted the motion filed on February 18, 2004, by the Appellee regarding the allotment of time for oral arguments.

Discretion of Court in Time Management

Application: The court's order delineates the specific amount of time each party is allowed for oral argument, reflecting the court's authority to manage proceedings efficiently.

Reasoning: UNC Hospitals and UNC Physicians are allocated 10 minutes of the total 60 minutes for oral argument. The Plaintiff Appellant and Defendant Appellees, specifically Jackson and Companion Property and Casualty, will each receive 25 minutes for their oral arguments.

Judicial Conference Decisions

Application: The decision regarding the allocation of time for oral arguments was made during a judicial conference, highlighting the procedural aspect of the court's decision-making process.

Reasoning: This order was issued by the Court during a conference on March 4, 2004.