You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

RUMFIELD v. Henney

Citations: 763 N.W.2d 913; 2009 WL 1107774Docket: 138041

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; April 22, 2009; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court denied the applications for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals' December 16, 2008 order in the case of Timothy Rumfield, Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel Rumfield, against Matthew Henney, Brian Henney, and Kelly Fuels, Inc. The Court found that the issues presented did not warrant review. The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis on April 22, 2009.

Legal Issues Addressed

Certification of Court Orders

Application: The order denying leave to appeal was officially certified by the court clerk, finalizing the court's decision.

Reasoning: The order was certified by Clerk Corbin R. Davis on April 22, 2009.

Denial of Leave to Appeal

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court exercised its discretion to deny the applications for leave to appeal, indicating that the case did not present issues warranting further review.

Reasoning: The Michigan Supreme Court denied the applications for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals' December 16, 2008 order.

Discretionary Review by Supreme Court

Application: The decision reflects the court's discretionary power to choose which cases merit its review, suggesting this case did not meet the criteria.

Reasoning: The Court found that the issues presented did not warrant review.