You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Bingham Township v. RLTD Railroad

Citations: 237 Mich. App. 538; 603 N.W.2d 795Docket: Docket No. 196418

Court: Michigan Court of Appeals; September 17, 1999; Michigan; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case centers on a transportation corridor owned by a private entity, RLTD, which was converted into a recreational trail by the Leelanau Trails Association (LTA) after obtaining permission from the Federal Surface Transportation Board. The township sought a declaratory judgment to enforce local zoning ordinances, aiming to halt further development and promotion by the LTA, alleging non-compliance with local planning. The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants, citing state and federal law preemption over local zoning. On remand, the court assessed the applicability of the Michigan Trailways Act (MTA) and the State Transportation Preservation Act (STPA). The STPA was found inapplicable due to the absence of state ownership of the right of way. However, the MTA was applicable as the trailway was progressing toward meeting the Act’s criteria. The court confirmed that the MTA preempts local zoning, aligning with legislative intent to foster a statewide trail system without local interference. Thus, the township's zoning ordinances cannot impede the trailway's development, reaffirming the trail's public purpose and the LTA's continued operation and development of the trailway.

Legal Issues Addressed

Applicability of the Michigan Trailways Act

Application: The MTA applies to the trailway in question, as the trailway meets the criteria set out by the Act, even if not officially designated as a 'Michigan trailway' yet.

Reasoning: The trailway in question is defined as a 'trailway' under the MTA and is advancing toward 'Michigan trailway' status, justifying the application of MTA regulations.

Preemption of Local Zoning Ordinances by State Law

Application: The court found that state laws, specifically the Michigan Trailways Act (MTA), preempt local zoning ordinances, directly affecting the trailway development.

Reasoning: The MTA clearly establishes that while local ordinances are acknowledged, they do not control the development of Michigan trailways, with the commission having final say on relevant matters.

Role of Local Government in Trailway Development

Application: Local governments must participate in the development process of Michigan trailways, although their zoning ordinances cannot obstruct the state's trailway designation and development.

Reasoning: Local governmental units, including townships, have a role in the development of Michigan trailways, as mandated by the Michigan Trailways Act (MTA).

State Transportation Preservation Act Non-Applicability

Application: The STPA was deemed inapplicable as the state has not acquired the right of way, which is necessary for the Act's provisions to apply.

Reasoning: In the current situation, since the defendant RLTD has transferred its interest in the corridor to LTA through a land contract, the department does not own the corridor, rendering the STPA regulations inapplicable.