You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Hope Presbyterian Church v. Presbyterian Church

Citations: 352 Or. 668; 291 P.3d 711; 2012 Ore. LEXIS 823Docket: CC 07-2707-E2; CA A139430; SC S059584

Court: Oregon Supreme Court; November 29, 2012; Oregon; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of Oregon reviewed a church property dispute between Hope Presbyterian Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) (PCUSA), including its regional body, the Presbytery of the Cascades. The conflict began when Hope Presbyterian voted to disaffiliate from PCUSA in 2007 and sought to assert sole ownership over church properties through legal action. Initially, the circuit court ruled in favor of Hope Presbyterian, but the Court of Appeals reversed this decision, finding that the properties were held in trust for PCUSA. The Supreme Court affirmed this ruling, emphasizing the hierarchical nature of PCUSA's governance and the trust provisions in its governing documents. The court applied both the hierarchical deference and neutral principles approaches, concluding that Hope Presbyterian's property was indeed held in trust for PCUSA, based on Oregon trust law and past court rulings. It determined the trust was irrevocable under common law, despite arguments to the contrary by Hope Presbyterian. Consequently, the Supreme Court remanded the case for entry of judgment in favor of PCUSA, thereby securing PCUSA's claim over the disputed properties. The decision underscores the importance of hierarchical governance structures and express trust provisions in resolving church property disputes.

Legal Issues Addressed

Hierarchical Deference in Church Property Disputes

Application: The court applied the hierarchical deference approach, consistent with the Presbytery of Willamette case, recognizing PCUSA's governance documents and its hierarchical structure.

Reasoning: The Court of Appeals determined PCUSA as a hierarchical church, referencing the Book of Order's declaration that local church property is held in trust for PCUSA.

Neutral Principles Approach in Church Property Disputes

Application: The court applied the neutral principles approach and concluded that PCUSA's trust over Hope Presbyterian's property was valid based on Oregon trust law and church governance documents.

Reasoning: It noted Oregon trust law (ORS 130.150(1)(b)) allows for a trust to be created by the property owner's declaration.

Ownership of Church Property in Hierarchical Churches

Application: The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed that the property of Hope Presbyterian Church is held in trust for the national church, PCUSA, based on hierarchical governance structures.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' ruling. The case centered on whether the local church or the national church retains ownership rights to the disputed property.

Statute of Frauds and Trust Formation

Application: The court held that the Articles of Amendment signed by the corporation's officers met statutory requirements to establish a trust under ORS 93.020(1).

Reasoning: In this case, the Articles of Amendment indicated that Hope Presbyterian would hold property as trustee for PCUSA and was signed by the corporation's president and secretary, thus meeting ORS 93.020(1) requirements.

Trust Creation and Revocation under Oregon Law

Application: The court found that the trust established by Hope Presbyterian for PCUSA was irrevocable under Oregon common law as there was no express reservation of the right to revoke.

Reasoning: The trust established by Hope Presbyterian prior to 2006 is governed by common law, making it irrevocable unless the settlor expressly reserved the right to revoke it.