You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Policy Management Systems Corp. v. Consumers Insurance

Citations: 294 S.C. 506; 366 S.E.2d 33; 1988 S.C. App. LEXIS 21Docket: 1097

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina; February 21, 1988; South Carolina; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, Policy Management Systems Corporation (PMSC) filed a lawsuit against Consumers Insurance Company (CIC) to recover payments under a software license agreement. CIC, headquartered in Washington, challenged the jurisdiction of the South Carolina court, citing insufficient contacts with the state to satisfy due process. However, the trial court denied CIC's motion to dismiss, determining that CIC waived its jurisdictional objection by seeking an extension to respond to the complaint. The court further justified jurisdiction under the South Carolina Long Arm Statute, as key aspects of the contract, including training and implementation activities, occurred in South Carolina. CIC's participation in these activities, and the contract's execution and governance under South Carolina law, established the necessary minimum contacts. Additionally, the court emphasized South Carolina's interest in providing its citizens a forum for redress against out-of-state entities breaching contracts performed partly within its jurisdiction. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, ruling that the exercise of jurisdiction complied with constitutional due process standards.

Legal Issues Addressed

Constitutionality of Exercising Jurisdiction

Application: The court concluded that exercising jurisdiction was constitutional as CIC had sufficient contacts with South Carolina.

Reasoning: The determination of personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation depends on the specific facts of each case, and the appellate court is bound by the lower court’s findings unless there’s legal error or lack of evidentiary support.

Jurisdiction under South Carolina Long Arm Statute

Application: The court found jurisdiction under the South Carolina Long Arm Statute due to the contract being performed in South Carolina.

Reasoning: The license agreement, effective September 30, 1981, stipulated that services would be provided at PMSC's South Carolina location or other sites chosen by PMSC, and included provisions for system modifications at no additional cost.

Minimum Contacts and Due Process

Application: CIC's activities, including sending employees for training and executing the contract in South Carolina, met the minimum contacts required for due process.

Reasoning: While these activities alone may not establish the necessary minimum contacts, evidence indicates CIC performed under the agreement by sending employees to PMSC for software training between November 1981 and January 1983.

South Carolina's Interest in Contract Enforcement

Application: South Carolina has a vested interest in allowing its citizens to seek redress against foreign corporations for breaches of contracts performed in part within the state.

Reasoning: The court referenced Askins v. Firedoor Corp. of Florida, noting South Carolina's interest in allowing citizens to seek redress against foreign corporations for contract breaches, especially when contracts are performed in part within the state.

Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction Objection

Application: CIC waived its objection to personal jurisdiction by requesting an extension to respond to the complaint.

Reasoning: The trial judge ruled that CIC waived its objection to personal jurisdiction by requesting an extension to respond to the complaint.