You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Tammy Johnson v. Wausau Ins Co

Citation: Not availableDocket: 138815

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; October 26, 2010; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on October 26, 2010, regarding the case of Tammy Johnson, Guardian of Nancy Eastman, a Legally Incapacitated Person, against Wausau Insurance Company and Nationwide Indemnity, Inc., among others. The Court granted an application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' judgment from March 24, 2009, but instead of granting leave, it vacated both the Court of Appeals' judgment and the October 11, 2007 order of the Genesee Circuit Court. The case is remanded to the Genesee Circuit Court for reconsideration in light of the decision in University of Michigan Regents v. Titan Insurance Co., 487 Mich. 2010. Justices Corrigan and Young concurred with the decision to remand, noting their agreement with Justice Markman's dissenting opinion in the Titan case. The Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, Corbin R. Davis, certified the order as a true and complete copy.

Legal Issues Addressed

Judicial Concurrence

Application: Justices expressed agreement with the decision to remand and aligned with a dissenting opinion in a related case.

Reasoning: Justices Corrigan and Young concurred with the decision to remand, noting their agreement with Justice Markman's dissenting opinion in the Titan case.

Remand for Reconsideration

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court vacated previous judgments and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of a relevant decision.

Reasoning: The case is remanded to the Genesee Circuit Court for reconsideration in light of the decision in University of Michigan Regents v. Titan Insurance Co., 487 Mich. 2010.

Vacatur of Lower Court Judgments

Application: The Supreme Court vacated the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the Genesee Circuit Court, indicating procedural or substantive issues with the prior decisions.

Reasoning: The Court granted an application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals' judgment from March 24, 2009, but instead of granting leave, it vacated both the Court of Appeals' judgment and the October 11, 2007 order of the Genesee Circuit Court.