You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Blue River Financial Group Inc v. Tbi Enterprises Llc

Citation: Not availableDocket: 141910

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; March 7, 2011; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on March 8, 2011, regarding two cases involving Blue River Financial Group, Inc. and Computer Business World, L.L.C. as plaintiffs-appellees against various defendants-appellants, including TBI Enterprises, L.L.C., Eugene J. Thomas, and Walter Thomas. The court reviewed applications for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals’ judgments dated September 2, 2010, and denied these applications, indicating that the court was not persuaded that the issues raised warranted further review. Justice Zahra abstained from participation in the decision due to his prior involvement on the Court of Appeals panel. The Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, Corbin R. Davis, certified the order as a true and complete copy.

Legal Issues Addressed

Certification of Court Orders

Application: The Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, Corbin R. Davis, certified the order as an accurate and complete reflection of the court's decision.

Reasoning: The Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, Corbin R. Davis, certified the order as a true and complete copy.

Denial of Applications for Leave to Appeal

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court assessed the applications for leave to appeal and decided that the issues presented did not merit further examination.

Reasoning: The court reviewed applications for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals’ judgments dated September 2, 2010, and denied these applications, indicating that the court was not persuaded that the issues raised warranted further review.

Judicial Participation and Recusal

Application: Justice Zahra abstained from the decision-making process due to his previous involvement in the case at the Court of Appeals level, adhering to judicial standards for recusal.

Reasoning: Justice Zahra abstained from participation in the decision due to his prior involvement on the Court of Appeals panel.