Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court denied the applications for leave to appeal the October 26, 2010 judgments from the Court of Appeals in two cases involving plaintiffs Mohammed Nawwas and Mysa Nawwas against defendants Steven L. Sinelli and the University of Michigan Regents. The court concluded that the issues raised did not warrant review. Justices Marilyn Kelly and Diane M. Hathaway expressed dissent, indicating they would have granted leave to appeal. The order was authenticated by Clerk Corbin R. Davis on April 20, 2011.
Legal Issues Addressed
Authentication of Court Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The order denying the applications for leave to appeal was formally authenticated by the Clerk of the Court, ensuring the official and procedural validity of the court's decision.
Reasoning: The order was authenticated by Clerk Corbin R. Davis on April 20, 2011.
Denial of Leave to Appeal by Michigan Supreme Courtsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court exercised its discretion to deny the applications for leave to appeal, concluding that the issues raised in the cases did not merit further review.
Reasoning: The Michigan Supreme Court denied the applications for leave to appeal the October 26, 2010 judgments from the Court of Appeals in two cases involving plaintiffs Mohammed Nawwas and Mysa Nawwas against defendants Steven L. Sinelli and the University of Michigan Regents.
Dissenting Opinion on Granting Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justices Marilyn Kelly and Diane M. Hathaway disagreed with the majority's decision and would have allowed the appeals to proceed, indicating a split in opinion on the necessity of reviewing the case.
Reasoning: Justices Marilyn Kelly and Diane M. Hathaway expressed dissent, indicating they would have granted leave to appeal.