You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Arnold v. Haber

Citations: 909 N.W.2d 242; 501 Mich. 1039Docket: SC: 156820; COA: 338616

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; April 3, 2018; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2017 order from the Court of Appeals has been considered and is denied. The Court is not persuaded that the presented question warrants review. Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certifies that this is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the Court's direction.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Leave to Appeal

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court denied the application for leave to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeals, indicating that the question presented did not merit further review.

Reasoning: The application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2017 order from the Court of Appeals has been considered and is denied.

Discretionary Review by Supreme Court

Application: The Court exercised its discretion in determining that the question presented did not warrant review, thereby declining to consider the appeal.

Reasoning: The Court is not persuaded that the presented question warrants review.