You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State ex rel. DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

Citations: 92 N.E.3d 882; 2018 Ohio 731; 152 Ohio St. 3d 1413Docket: 2017–1562

Court: Ohio Supreme Court; February 28, 2018; Ohio; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in accordance with R.C. 2710.06(B)(1). The case is now returned to the regular docket as per S.Ct. Prac. R. 19.01. The filing party is required to submit either an application for dismissal or a notice of failure of settlement within 60 days. If neither is filed within this timeframe, the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Legal Issues Addressed

Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Application: If the required documents are not filed within the specified timeframe, the case will be dismissed due to inactivity.

Reasoning: If neither is filed within this timeframe, the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Filing Requirement for Dismissal or Notice of Failure of Settlement

Application: The filing party must submit an application for dismissal or a notice of failure of settlement within a specified period to avoid automatic dismissal.

Reasoning: The filing party is required to submit either an application for dismissal or a notice of failure of settlement within 60 days.

Return to Regular Docket Under S.Ct. Prac. R. 19.01

Application: The case, after reaching a settlement, is returned to the regular docket as per the specified court rule.

Reasoning: The case is now returned to the regular docket as per S.Ct. Prac. R. 19.01.

Settlement Agreement Under R.C. 2710.06(B)(1)

Application: The parties have reached a settlement agreement that influences the procedural status of the case.

Reasoning: The court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in accordance with R.C. 2710.06(B)(1).