You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

LARRY KLAYMAN v. ROGER STONE

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-3444

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; October 13, 2022; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Larry Klayman, the appellant, filed an appeal against Roger Stone, the appellee, in the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District. The appeal originated from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, presided over by Judge David A. Haimes, under case number 19-2672 CACE (08). The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision. The ruling was made by a per curiam opinion, with Judges Warner, Ciklin, and Artau concurring. The decision is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved. Klayman represented himself in the appeal, while Stone was represented by Robert C. Buschel of Buschel Gibbons, P.A.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Decisions

Application: The appellate court affirmed the decision of the lower court in favor of the appellee, Roger Stone, indicating that the lower court's ruling was upheld.

Reasoning: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The appellate court's decision is not considered final until any motions for rehearing that are filed timely have been resolved, indicating that the procedural process allows for potential further consideration.

Reasoning: The decision is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Per Curiam Opinion

Application: The decision of the appellate court was issued as a per curiam opinion, meaning it was delivered by the panel of judges collectively and unanimously without identifying any particular judge as the author.

Reasoning: The ruling was made by a per curiam opinion, with Judges Warner, Ciklin, and Artau concurring.

Representation by Counsel

Application: Roger Stone was represented by attorney Robert C. Buschel, exemplifying the principle that parties may choose to be represented by legal counsel in appellate proceedings.

Reasoning: Stone was represented by Robert C. Buschel of Buschel Gibbons, P.A.

Self-Representation in Appeals

Application: Larry Klayman represented himself in the appeal, demonstrating the legal principle that parties have the right to self-representation in legal proceedings.

Reasoning: Klayman represented himself in the appeal.