You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

People of Michigan v. Jean Pierre Orlewicz

Citation: Not availableDocket: 143453

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; May 21, 2012; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on May 21, 2012, regarding the case of People of the State of Michigan v. Jean Pierre Orlewicz. The Court granted a motion for miscellaneous relief and considered the application for leave to appeal a judgment from the Court of Appeals dated June 14, 2011. Notably, the Court acknowledged that the case of People v. Vaughn is currently pending appeal, and its outcome may impact the issues raised in Orlewicz's application for leave to appeal. Consequently, the Court ordered that the application be held in abeyance until a decision is made in the Vaughn case. The order was certified by Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court.

Legal Issues Addressed

Abeyance of Application for Leave to Appeal

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that the application for leave to appeal be held in abeyance pending the decision in a related case, People v. Vaughn.

Reasoning: Consequently, the Court ordered that the application be held in abeyance until a decision is made in the Vaughn case.

Granting of Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court granted a motion for miscellaneous relief in the case of People of the State of Michigan v. Jean Pierre Orlewicz.

Reasoning: The Court granted a motion for miscellaneous relief and considered the application for leave to appeal a judgment from the Court of Appeals dated June 14, 2011.

Impact of Pending Appeal on Related Cases

Application: The outcome of the People v. Vaughn case, which is currently pending appeal, may affect the issues in Orlewicz's application for leave to appeal.

Reasoning: Notably, the Court acknowledged that the case of People v. Vaughn is currently pending appeal, and its outcome may impact the issues raised in Orlewicz's application for leave to appeal.