You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

IGOR SUSHKO and AUTOMOTIVE NETWORK, INC. v. HENRY VANVURST

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-3162

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 30, 2022; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Igor Sushko and Automotive Network, Inc. appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, presided over by Judge Nicholas R. Lopane. The case number is CACE16-003563. The appeal was heard by the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, with Judges May, Gerber, and Forst concurring. The ruling is not final pending any timely filed motion for rehearing. Robert J. Hantman represented the appellants, while Meaghan K. Marro represented appellee Henry VanVurst.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appeal and Review in Civil Cases

Application: The appellate court reviewed the decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit and affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Reasoning: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, with Judges May, Gerber, and Forst concurring.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The decision of the appellate court is not considered final until any potential timely filed motions for rehearing are resolved.

Reasoning: The ruling is not final pending any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Judicial Process in Appellate Courts

Application: The case was presented before the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida and involved a panel of judges who reviewed the appeal.

Reasoning: The appeal was heard by the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida.

Representation of Parties in Appeal

Application: The appellants and appellee were represented by legal counsel during the appeal process, ensuring the parties had professional legal representation.

Reasoning: Robert J. Hantman represented the appellants, while Meaghan K. Marro represented appellee Henry VanVurst.