You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

in Re Rockstar Remodeling and Diamond Decks, LLC And Donald M. Ferguson A/K/A Donnie M. Ferguson

Citation: Not availableDocket: 03-22-00547-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; September 22, 2022; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

A petition for writ of mandamus was filed by Relator, Rockstar Remodeling and Diamond Decks, LLC, along with Donald M. Ferguson, seeking an emergency motion to stay an underlying proceeding from Comal County. The Texas Court of Appeals granted the emergency motion in part, temporarily staying the trial court’s order dated August 26, 2022, while requesting further responses. After reviewing the petition, relevant records, and responses, the Court denied the writ of mandamus and lifted the temporary stay on the trial court’s order. The opinion was filed by Justice Melissa Goodwin, with Justices Baker and Kelly also participating, and included a dissent from Justice Kelly. This decision was finalized on September 22, 2022.

Legal Issues Addressed

Emergency Motion to Stay Proceedings

Application: The Court temporarily stayed the trial court’s order while considering the emergency motion, demonstrating the Court's discretion in managing ongoing proceedings.

Reasoning: The Texas Court of Appeals granted the emergency motion in part, temporarily staying the trial court’s order dated August 26, 2022, while requesting further responses.

Judicial Authority in Issuing Temporary Stays

Application: The decision to grant a temporary stay highlights the appellate court's authority to intervene in lower court proceedings when necessary.

Reasoning: The Texas Court of Appeals granted the emergency motion in part, temporarily staying the trial court’s order dated August 26, 2022, while requesting further responses.

Judicial Dissent

Application: Justice Kelly’s dissent reflects differing judicial perspectives on the appropriateness of granting the writ of mandamus.

Reasoning: The opinion was filed by Justice Melissa Goodwin, with Justices Baker and Kelly also participating, and included a dissent from Justice Kelly.

Writ of Mandamus Requirements

Application: The Texas Court of Appeals reviewed the petition for writ of mandamus to determine if it met the necessary requirements for issuance.

Reasoning: After reviewing the petition, relevant records, and responses, the Court denied the writ of mandamus and lifted the temporary stay on the trial court’s order.