You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

YEENLY ALBEJAS RODRIGUEZ v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-2708

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 23, 2022; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Yeenly Albejas Rodriguez appealed a decision from the Circuit Court of Collier County regarding a case against Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company. The District Court of Appeal of Florida's Second District issued a ruling on September 23, 2022, affirming the lower court's decision. The judges involved in the ruling were Northcutt, Black, and Lucas, all of whom concurred with the judgment. The opinion is noted to be subject to revision before official publication. Legal representation for the appellant was provided by Jose P. Font, while the appellee was represented by Andrew A. Labbe and Kimberly A. Salmon.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment

Application: The District Court of Appeal of Florida's Second District upheld the decision of the lower court, indicating agreement with the initial judgment.

Reasoning: The District Court of Appeal of Florida's Second District issued a ruling on September 23, 2022, affirming the lower court's decision.

Appeal from Circuit Court Decision

Application: The appellant, Yeenly Albejas Rodriguez, challenged the decision of the Circuit Court of Collier County, but the appeal was rejected by the appellate court.

Reasoning: Yeenly Albejas Rodriguez appealed a decision from the Circuit Court of Collier County regarding a case against Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company.

Concurrence of Judges in Appellate Decision

Application: All judges involved in the appellate decision, namely Northcutt, Black, and Lucas, unanimously agreed with the judgment to affirm the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: The judges involved in the ruling were Northcutt, Black, and Lucas, all of whom concurred with the judgment.