Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on November 7, 2012, regarding the case of Daniel Adair et al. v. Court of Appeals. The court reviewed the complaint for superintending control and ultimately denied the requested relief, stating that the court was not persuaded to grant it. Justice Marilyn Kelly expressed a differing opinion, indicating she would have granted superintending control. The order was certified by Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dissenting Opinions in Judicial Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justice Marilyn Kelly dissented from the majority opinion, demonstrating the possibility of differing judicial views even within the same court order.
Reasoning: Justice Marilyn Kelly expressed a differing opinion, indicating she would have granted superintending control.
Superintending Control in Michigan Courtssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court denied the complaint for superintending control, indicating a lack of persuasion to grant such relief.
Reasoning: The court reviewed the complaint for superintending control and ultimately denied the requested relief, stating that the court was not persuaded to grant it.