You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Whittington v. Turnpike Ford, Inc.

Citations: 170 W. Va. 769; 296 S.E.2d 899; 1982 W. Va. LEXIS 789Docket: No. 15308

Court: West Virginia Supreme Court; May 28, 1982; West Virginia; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

An appeal by Donna Whittington contests a $1,000 attorney fee awarded by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County in her breach of warranty case against Turnpike Ford, Inc. Whittington claims the fee is inadequate, while Turnpike Ford argues that her acceptance of $1,041.91, paid by the Charleston National Bank in satisfaction of the award, bars her from appealing the fee amount. The court agrees with Turnpike Ford, citing a precedent that states a litigant who benefits from a judgment cannot later challenge it. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as improperly granted.

Legal Issues Addressed

Acceptance of Judgment Benefits and Appeal

Application: The court determined that a litigant who accepts the benefits of a judgment is barred from appealing the judgment, as demonstrated by Whittington's acceptance of the awarded amount.

Reasoning: Whittington claims the fee is inadequate, while Turnpike Ford argues that her acceptance of $1,041.91, paid by the Charleston National Bank in satisfaction of the award, bars her from appealing the fee amount.

Dismissal of Appeal Due to Acceptance of Judgment

Application: The court dismissed Whittington's appeal regarding the attorney fee award because her acceptance of the payment was seen as acknowledgment of the judgment's validity, aligning with established legal precedent.

Reasoning: The court agrees with Turnpike Ford, citing a precedent that states a litigant who benefits from a judgment cannot later challenge it. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as improperly granted.