Gregson & Associates Architects v. Government of the Virgin Islands

Citations: 18 V.I. 361; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9363Docket: Civil No. 76/711

Court: District Court, Virgin Islands; February 25, 1981; Federal District Court

SummaryOriginalCytator Case TreatmentBackward CitatorAnalysis

EnglishEspañolSimplified EnglishEspañol Fácil

The case involves a dispute over architectural services provided by Wilfred Gregson for a public high school and physical education facility in the Virgin Islands. The trial was presided over by Judge Daniel J. Snyder on January 16, 1980, who passed away before issuing a decision. The attorneys agreed to determine the findings based on the trial transcript alone. Gregson previously had contracts with the Government of the Virgin Islands for three schools but did not receive signed contracts or payment for the current project. 

A document presented as a contract for architect-engineer services, dated November 26, 1974, was signed by officials but lacked the signature of the Commissioner of Property and Procurement, which is required for contracts exceeding $40,000. Testimony from former Governor Melvin Evans indicated that he recalled signing a contract related to these projects, but no formal documentation was provided. Gregson acknowledged he was aware of the absence of a binding contract and stated he was taking a risk in expecting one. Despite attempts to negotiate a payment discount due to delays, he ultimately did not receive payment. Defense testimony indicated that the plans were never accepted by the Commissioner of Education and were not used in any construction by the government. Gregson's claims were based on an express contract theory and, alternatively, on quantum meruit, but the law mandates specific approval for contracts over $40,000, which was not obtained in this instance.

Contracts exceeding $40,000 must comply with chapter 23 of Title 31, under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Property and Procurement. This chapter mandates that the Commissioner purchase or contract for supplies and services for all government agencies in the Virgin Islands, excluding the Legislature and Municipal Court. The Commissioner can establish regulations to facilitate these operations, and only the Department of Property and Procurement holds the authority to negotiate contracts, unless stated otherwise by law.

If a contract violates this chapter, it is deemed null and ineffective, and any public funds spent may be recovered by the government. In the current case, both the gymnasium and high school plans exceeded the $40,000 threshold, necessitating contracts through the Commissioner. However, there is no evidence that the Commissioner negotiated, approved, or signed the disputed contracts. Consequently, even a signature by the Governor would not suffice for compliance, rendering those contracts void rather than voidable.

The absence of an express contract raises the issue of potential recovery on a quasi-contractual basis, such as quantum meruit. However, there is no evidence that the Government benefited from the plans, nor any claim of unjust enrichment or fraud. The plaintiff, Gregson, did not believe he had a valid contract but hoped one would materialize. Without unjust enrichment or an implied promise, the basis for quasi-contract recovery is absent. Furthermore, precedent from Sargeant v. Government of the Virgin Islands establishes that quantum meruit recovery is not permitted if 31 V.I.C. 249 is violated. Therefore, lacking grounds for recovery, judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, the Government of the Virgin Islands.