Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Citations: 337 U.S. 913; 69 S. Ct. 1155; 93 L. Ed. 1724; 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2995Docket: No. 694
Court: Supreme Court of the United States; May 31, 1949; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court
Certiorari has been granted specifically to address the interpretation of Section 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 158 (3), in relation to the case at hand. The petitioner is represented by Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum. The National Labor Relations Board, as the respondent, is represented by Solicitor General Perlman, along with attorneys Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand, and Bernard Durum. Additionally, Mathew O. Tobriner represents the International Chemical Workers Union, A.F. of L., also as a respondent in this matter.