Narrative Opinion Summary
Certiorari has been granted specifically to address the interpretation of Section 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 158 (3), in relation to the case at hand. The petitioner is represented by Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum. The National Labor Relations Board, as the respondent, is represented by Solicitor General Perlman, along with attorneys Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand, and Bernard Durum. Additionally, Mathew O. Tobriner represents the International Chemical Workers Union, A.F. of L., also as a respondent in this matter.
Legal Issues Addressed
Interpretation of Section 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Actsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court has granted certiorari to specifically address how Section 8(3) should be interpreted concerning the facts of the present case.
Reasoning: Certiorari has been granted specifically to address the interpretation of Section 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 158 (3), in relation to the case at hand.
Representation of Parties in Labor Disputesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The petitioner and respondents are represented by a team of legal professionals, indicating the adversarial nature of the proceedings concerning the National Labor Relations Act.
Reasoning: The petitioner is represented by Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum. The National Labor Relations Board, as the respondent, is represented by Solicitor General Perlman, along with attorneys Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand, and Bernard Durum. Additionally, Mathew O. Tobriner represents the International Chemical Workers Union, A.F. of L., also as a respondent in this matter.