You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United States

Citation: 319 U.S. 778Docket: Nos. 907 and 908

Court: Supreme Court of the United States; June 14, 1943; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The petition for rehearing has been granted, and the previous order denying certiorari has been vacated. A petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has been granted. Justice Roberts did not participate in the consideration or decision regarding these applications. Legal representatives for the petitioner include E. Ennalls Berl, Albert C. Wall, Mason Trowbridge, and Edward J. O’Mara. The United States is represented by Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Clark, Jr., along with Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, and Alvin J. Rockwell.

Legal Issues Addressed

Judicial Participation

Application: Justice Roberts did not take part in the consideration or decision, which is noted in the judicial process, ensuring transparency in participation.

Reasoning: Justice Roberts did not participate in the consideration or decision regarding these applications.

Jurisdiction of Certiorari

Application: The Supreme Court has exercised its authority to review a decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit by granting a petition for writs of certiorari.

Reasoning: A petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has been granted.

Rehearing and Certiorari Procedure

Application: The court has granted a petition for rehearing, which involves vacating the previous order denying certiorari, thereby allowing further judicial review.

Reasoning: The petition for rehearing has been granted, and the previous order denying certiorari has been vacated.