You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Wisconsin v. Illinois

Citation: 309 U.S. 636Docket: No. 2; No. 3; No. 4

Court: Supreme Court of the United States; April 3, 1940; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Court addressed a petition from the State of Illinois seeking temporary modification of a previous decree related to the Illinois Waterway. The Court appointed Special Master Monte M. Lemann to investigate the potential health risks posed by untreated sewage to residents of the affected communities and to assess feasible remedial measures Illinois could take without increasing water diversion from Lake Michigan. The Special Master is empowered to hire assistance, schedule sessions for gathering evidence, issue subpoenas, and administer oaths. His report will be printed by the Court's clerk, and he will receive reimbursement for expenses and compensation for services, with costs to be divided among the parties by the Court. The Chief Justice retains the authority to appoint a new Special Master should the current one decline or vacate the position. This procedural step ensures a thorough examination of the environmental and health impacts associated with the waterway, promoting the interests of the complainant States while maintaining judicial oversight of the remedial process.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appointment of a Special Master

Application: The Court appointed Special Master Monte M. Lemann to conduct a summary inquiry into the conditions of the Illinois Waterway.

Reasoning: The Court has ordered the referral of the State of Illinois' petition for temporary modification of a previous decree to Special Master Monte M. Lemann.

Authority to Appoint New Special Master

Application: The Chief Justice has the authority to appoint a new Special Master if the current appointment is declined or becomes vacant.

Reasoning: Should the appointment of the Special Master be declined or become vacant, the Chief Justice is empowered to appoint a new Special Master with equivalent authority.

Compensation and Costs

Application: The Special Master will be reimbursed for expenses and compensated for services, with costs allocated among parties as determined by the Court.

Reasoning: The Special Master will be reimbursed for actual expenses and compensated for services, with costs allocated among the parties as determined by the Court.

Feasibility of Remedial Measures

Application: The Special Master will explore the feasibility of potential remedial measures that Illinois could implement without increasing water diversion from Lake Michigan.

Reasoning: Additionally, the Special Master will explore the feasibility of potential remedial measures that Illinois could implement without increasing water diversion from Lake Michigan.

Health Risk Assessment

Application: The Special Master is tasked with assessing whether untreated sewage poses a health risk to residents of the complaining communities.

Reasoning: This decision follows the responses from the complainant States to a rule issued on January 29, 1940.

Scope of Special Master’s Authority

Application: Special Master Lemann has the authority to hire assistance, schedule evidence sessions, issue subpoenas, and administer oaths.

Reasoning: The Special Master is granted the authority to hire stenographic and clerical assistance, schedule evidence gathering sessions, issue subpoenas, and administer oaths.