Narrative Opinion Summary
The appeal has been dismissed due to the absence of a substantial federal question, as per the motion of the appellee. The decision cites several precedents, including Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp. (105 Fla. 105; 143 So. 912), and various U.S. Supreme Court cases such as Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hilton-Green (241 U.S. 613, 623), American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co. (250 U.S. 2, 10-11, 13-14), and Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs (172 U.S. 557, 565-566), among others. These citations support the court's conclusion that the appeal lacks sufficient grounds for consideration.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Substantial Federal Questionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeal was dismissed because it did not present a substantial federal question, as supported by precedents.
Reasoning: The appeal has been dismissed due to the absence of a substantial federal question, as per the motion of the appellee.
Use of Precedents in Dismissing Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court cited multiple precedents to justify the dismissal of the appeal, indicating that established case law supports the conclusion reached.
Reasoning: The decision cites several precedents, including Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp. (105 Fla. 105; 143 So. 912), and various U.S. Supreme Court cases such as Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hilton-Green (241 U.S. 613, 623), American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co. (250 U.S. 2, 10-11, 13-14), and Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs (172 U.S. 557, 565-566), among others.