Narrative Opinion Summary
The appeal is dismissed due to the lack of a properly presented federal question, referencing previous cases such as Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, Cleveland. Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., and White River Co. v. Arkansas. The papers submitted for the appeal are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, which is also denied. Mr. Samuel B. Bassett represents the appellees.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Federal Questionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeal is dismissed because it fails to present a properly framed federal question, which is necessary for the court to exercise jurisdiction.
Reasoning: The appeal is dismissed due to the lack of a properly presented federal question, referencing previous cases such as Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, Cleveland. Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., and White River Co. v. Arkansas.
Treatment of Appeal Papers as Petition for Writ of Certiorarisubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court treats the submitted appeal papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, which is subsequently denied, indicating that the case does not merit review.
Reasoning: The papers submitted for the appeal are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, which is also denied.