Narrative Opinion Summary
The appeal is dismissed as the District Court's order only reinstated an interlocutory injunction based on this Court's prior opinion. The parties are instructed to proceed with the trial on the merits as directed by this Court. The appellants are represented by attorneys Oscar E. Carlstrom, Samuel A. Ettelson, George I. Haight, Benjamin F. Goldstein, Edmund D. Adcock, and Francis X. Busch, while the appellee is represented by Horace Kent Tenney, Charles M. Bracelen, William H. Thompson, Kenneth F. Burgess, R. A. Van Orsdel, and Leslie N. Jones.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Proceduresubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, directing the parties to proceed with the trial on the merits as per its previous instructions, emphasizing the procedural step of moving forward to a full trial after addressing preliminary issues.
Reasoning: The parties are instructed to proceed with the trial on the merits as directed by this Court.
Interlocutory Injunctionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The District Court's order reinstated an interlocutory injunction based on the prior opinion of the appellate court, demonstrating the court's authority to maintain interim relief measures pending a final decision.
Reasoning: The appeal is dismissed as the District Court's order only reinstated an interlocutory injunction based on this Court's prior opinion.